Before and after the initial surgical simulation test run
Developed in collaboration with Andrew Grosvenor and clinical partners at iRSM, this project focused on creating realistic physical models to support surgical training in complex head and neck reconstruction. Working closely with surgeons Dr. Hadi Seikaly and Dr. Jeffrey Harris, we translated a highly intricate procedure into a hands-on learning experience.
The models were designed to simulate key aspects of the surgery, allowing participants to remove a mock tumor, reconstruct the tongue and the mandible using a fibula graft, and plate the structure as they would in a real procedure.
By enabling surgeons to perform the procedure in a controlled, physical environment, these models improved understanding, confidence, and skill development - providing a more effective alternative to purely observational or theoretical training.
I designed the skull to connect to a camera mount, allowing it to pivot in all directions for easy handling and demonstration during training.
Designed for usability and education, the jaw features a removable ball joint, while the base uses a sliding assembly to keep the skull secure yet easy to assemble and disassemble.
Hands-on testing with the surgeons was essential to bridging the gap between technical design and clinical practice. We used these prototyping sessions to observe how the models were handled, where assumptions broke down, and how the procedure was interpreted in real time.
These interactions became a feedback loop, informing iterative refinements to the models while also shaping how the surgical technique was communicated and taught. Adjustments to material behaviour, assembly, and anatomical cues helped better reflect the realities of the procedure, while clearer instructional strategies improved how participants engaged with the training.
This ongoing dialogue between designers and surgeons ensured the final experience was not only technically accurate, but also intuitive and effective in a teaching environment. Ultimately elevating the quality of the international surgical workshop, and eventually, patient outcomes.
Prototype testing sessions were essential for refinement
Designing the molds was an adventure. Complex anatomy leads to challenges in releasing the molds.
In-house resin 3D prints were used in the mold making process for rapid iterations.
Different parts, like the tongue, required different feel and softness to simulate actual anatomy.
According to the surgeons, the finished models created a lifelike feel when performing the mock surgery.
The surgical training seminar combined an overhead camera system with individual workstations, allowing each participant to follow along and practice in real time. Dr. Harris guided the procedure throughout the course, demonstrating techniques, answering questions, and assessing proficiency as surgeons worked through each step.
This approach marked a shift from the traditional “see one, do one, teach one” model toward a more structured, simulation-based method focused on repetition, feedback, and measurable skill development. The integration of physical models and guided instruction enabled participants to build confidence and competency in a controlled environment.
Contributing to training methods that support safer, more effective surgical outcomes is something I’m deeply proud of.